Error 740 far cry 3 fix windows 10 keygen#

Error 740 far cry 3 fix windows 10 keygen#

I've adjusted the settings for the memory, seems stable in gaming at 3333MHz CL14 for now. What I'm wondering is whether I'm missing something obvious or have an exceptionally crappy IMC. I've tried things like using the alternate ProcODT settings and limiting TDP to 45W, thinking it was a power draw issue. I experienced the same issue with my previous memory kit, a 16GB Hynix CJR kit from G-Skill.

This happens at lower frequencies as well, tested 34MHz w/ Safe Calc presets, seems to disappear below 3266MHz. I can push the frequency to 3466MHz with the Safe profile from the Ryzen DRAM Calculator and successfully run memory tests without issue, however when I load a lightweight game for testing (bone-stock Half Life 2), the system will blackout within 5-7 minutes of play. My problem stems from trying to overclock the RAM. Motherboard: ASRock Fatal1ty B450 Gaming-ITX/ac w/ latest BIOS v3.70Ĭase & Power Supply: Inwin Chopin w/ integrated 150W 80plus bronze PSU Memory: Patriot Viper 4 Blackout 4000MHz CL19 16GB (Samsung B-Die) Hi all, I've got an unusual problem I'm trying to wrap my head around. Overall, the Ryzen 5 3500X is an average performer with its 6-cores and 6-threads in this benchmark. Again, we see the Ryzen 5 3500X's slight improvement over AMD's previous-gen Ryzen 5 2400G. The Ryzen 5 3500X establishes a tangible lead over Intel's Core i5 processors, including the tuned Core i5-9600. AMD's Ryzen 5 3500X notches a small win over the Ryzen 5 2400G, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Core i5-9500. The Ryzen 5 3500X's performance earns it the 16th place. The Ryzen 5 2400G clearly shows how significantly the mid-range Raven Ridge-based CPUs fall behind the Zen 2 models. That's a ~7.7% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Ryzen 5 2400G tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Zen 2-based successor. In this benchmark, the Ryzen 5 3500X has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Ryzen 5 2400G by 7.7%. The Ryzen 5 3500X takes a comfortable 0.8% lead over the Core i5-9500. It is 0.5% lower than the Core i5-9600 while being 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 5 3500. The Ryzen 5 3500X sits between Core i5-9600 and Ryzen 5 3500. Overall, the Ryzen 5 3400G is a low performer with its 4-cores and 8-threads in this benchmark. The Ryzen 5 3400G's performance earns it the 41st place.

The Ryzen 5 2400G clearly shows how significantly the mid-range Raven Ridge-based CPUs fall behind the Zen+ models. That's a ~0.7% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Ryzen 5 2400G tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Zen+-based successor. In this benchmark, the Ryzen 5 3400G has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Ryzen 5 2400G by 0.7%. It is 0% lower than the Core i5-7400 while being 0% higher than the Ryzen G. The Ryzen 5 3400G sits between Core i5-7400 and Ryzen G.